Eddy Nigg wrote:
On 02/10/2009 10:06 PM, Frank Hecker:
If you cannot publish the CPS because it contains private information, I
suggest as an alternative that you provide some sort of official
Certigna document that summarizes the portions of the CPS that are of
most interest to us (i.e., those relating to validation of subcriber
information).
That would be a precedent too which I wouldn't recommend. We really want
to know what was audited, don't we?
See my comment to David Ross.
Frank
--
Frank Hecker
hec...@mozillafoundation.org
--
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
