Erwann, true, we did omit the required IPv6 constraint.  Given the expiration
of the cross-certificate, we were not able to wait for the 5.4 version of
our PKI software currently in QA, which enables IPv6 excluded subtrees, to
be released.  We expect to make longer term arrangements with BIT at a time
when we can enforce the IPv6 block.

As this is a cross certificate, we had to introduce the entire namespace in
a single certificate rather than multiple CAs because the issued end entity
certificates with life extending beyond the past weekend all originate from
one existing CA.  Only the cross certificate was expiring and it needed to
cover the existing operational name space.  

We also wanted to document the entire researched name space at the same time
that we took an exception to BR 1.1.6's 9.7/9.2.4, where to support the
existing base of certificates properly we were forced to omit the required
locality called for in 9.2.4 in one of the directory names.  This was to be
clear that we understand and intend to properly implement the requirements
of 9.2.4, but had a legacy obstacle that caused one directory name to be
required that omits locality and state/province.  This was the o=admin,c=CH
name.  Given the BIT's registration of o=admin as associated to an OID in
their arc, established by law, we opted to treat o=admin as a Doing Business
As value supported by the QGIS of documented exclusive use of this name
published on the Swiss OFCOM site.

BIT now has the name constraints in place to move o=admin,c=CH directory
named certificates into the more specific names we found in WHOIS data and
Swiss QGIS.

Rob, we opted to include the dotless and the dotted DNSNames to support
https://ch.ch as well as https://www.ch.ch.  I foresee doing this as regular
practice, as it seems short URLs would be a burdensome reason to re-issue a
subordinate CA.  Granted, it's a lot of think, especially for
battery-powered devices.

-Steve



--
View this message in context: 
http://mozilla.6506.n7.nabble.com/id-ce-nameConstraints-2-5-29-30-in-the-real-world-tp297147p297380.html
Sent from the Mozilla - Cryptography mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- 
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto

Reply via email to