Yeah that's a very good point, thanks. I agree that we should try to backport these changes. I will work on patches for aurora and beta today and request approval.
Jan On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Ryan VanderMeulen <[email protected]> wrote: > I mentioned in channel today that uplifting patches to esr24 is going to be > more time-consuming due to the renaming work underway for s/ion/jit. > > Waldo mentioned that this might be a change worth backporting for easier > maintenance over the next year. Plus IMO, it would be nice if the SM24 > source release shipped the renaming along with the features that > precipitated it rather than waiting for SM31. > > Since the issue is purely cosmetic and shouldn't have any affect on what is > shipped to users, it seems that there shouldn't be any issue from the > release side of things. Is there a good reason not to pursue this? > _______________________________________________ > dev-tech-js-engine-internals mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-internals _______________________________________________ dev-tech-js-engine-internals mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-internals
