I watched (still watch) all new bugs on the JS component and CC myself to ones that seem relevant. I also get bugmail for new patches posted and bugs that are fixed, but I don't follow that as closely. I never followed all activity in the JS component, though, which I think you did (you had this surprising ability to appear in a bug out of nowhere :) back in the day. I assume that following all activity in the JS component these days would be prohibitively time consuming, but maybe I'm wrong.
----- Original Message ----- > Luke Wagner wrote: > > So what does that leave in the immediate scope of the general js module? > > The way I see it, quite a lot: implementing new JS features, evaluating > > JS language proposals for implementability, participating in standards > > discussions, improving the JS engine's dev tool support, maintaining and > > improving the jsapi, and promoting good code and engine-wide > > styles/idioms. At least, these are things I've seen myself involved in > > and other people involving me in. > > One question: I used to spend a ton of time reading bugmail, mostly > SpiderMonkey. I don't any longer. This seems important for the owner to > do directly or else delegate to ownerly peers. What's the new model? > > /be > _______________________________________________ dev-tech-js-engine-internals mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-internals
