With attachments

On 02/03/2014 11:08 AM, Stéphanie Ouillon wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Ivan forwarded me the script Jim wrote to benchmark the impact of
> tainting on SpiderMonkey (see attachments, I fixed bits in the patch to
> apply it on recent mozilla-central code).
> I ran the tests several times (performance mode, in console) on commits
> 
> 4b7f81db2646
> 9bca7390eb1f
> 0fd024e3ef80
> c459007b7461
> 0e57e50718a2
> 
> I don't know what was intended to be done after that, so I'm posting the
> results here to have any feedback.
> 
> 
> Stéphanie / feeding a dead thread with data /
> 
> 4b7f81db2646 9bca7390eb1f 0fd024e3ef80 c459007b7461 0e57e50718a2'
> 
> On Sunday, September 1, 2013 10:04:52 AM UTC+2, Jim Blandy wrote:
> 
>     Oh, this thread isn't dead, I hope - it's waiting for me to pull my  
>     benchmark results together and post them... which I expect to get to
> this  
>     coming week.
> 
>     "Waiting for data" != "dead"
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dev-tech-js-engine-internals mailing list
> dev-tech-js-engine-internals@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-internals
> 
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine-internals mailing list
dev-tech-js-engine-internals@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-internals

Reply via email to