Please don't misunderstand --- I think the relationship can certainly be
a success. It'll just take more attention from the SpiderMonkey team
than they seem to expect.
On 02/13/2014 05:53 AM, Petar Jovanovic wrote:
I will disagree with the above, since having multiple forks instead of
one repo has been proven to be inefficient in multiple opensource
projects, as it duplicates a lot of engineering effort for rebasing
and important, misses to leverage wisdom of more people working on the
same project.
I think many of the same disadvantages will accrue here, if most of the
Mozilla team ignores the effects of their changes on the MIPS support.
It also brings up confusion to the community.
Certainly, as a demonstration of commitment, having the changes in-tree
is much better. I only want to point out the tension between that
commitment and the "tier 3" designation.
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine-internals mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-internals
