On 2/12/14 5:25 PM, Jim Blandy wrote: > As hinted at previously, the DevTools group would like to introduce a > new representation of saved (not live) JS stacks to SpiderMonkey. Our > immediate need is to record the stacks at which JS objects are > allocated, for our memory profiling tools, but we'd like to introduce > something general enough that Error, and other sorts of captured > stacks, could switch to using it.
Yes please. +1. This will not just make new things possible and make existing things more efficient. It will also eliminate some embarrassing bugs, special cases, and silliness. > We're discussing our prototype design in bug 972045, but since we want > this to be part of SpiderMonkey, we can only proceed with a design > that the team would look forward to. Maybe I don't understand. What's not to like? -j _______________________________________________ dev-tech-js-engine-internals mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-internals
