On 2017-01-27 2:12 PM, Brian Hackett wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Julian Seward <jsew...@acm.org> wrote: >> On 27/01/17 16:36, Brian Hackett wrote: >>> Any thoughts or comments? >> >> It would be really good if testing for data races with TSan could be >> an integral, routine part of this development process. We've seen in >> the past that after-the-fact race detection and fixing is a slow and >> difficult process, and it would be much better to do this as you go >> along. Plus, having something that can validate intuitions about >> race-freedom (or otherwise) of code is in itself helpful for hacking. > > Yeah, I agree completely about how hard it is to fix races in an > existing system. Using ProtectedData should help a lot with making > sure we have a coherent synchronization model in place, but using that > class *plus* TSan running in automation would be great.
What kind of concurrency are you worried here about that TSan can help with? _______________________________________________ dev-tech-js-engine-internals mailing list dev-tech-js-engine-internals@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-internals
