> Is there a definition of "reasonable-sized" ? If a class is sufficiently complex, comprehension can be impeded if the methods are "far" from the definitions of the data they act on. Such a class would be "unreasonably-sized."
The distinction is based on how many logical "pieces" of the struct you can comfortably maintain in your short-term memory. On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:16 AM, <sle...@mozilla.com> wrote: > Hello, > > On Monday, October 2, 2017 at 5:04:27 PM UTC+2, Jason Orendorff wrote: > > Thanks, everyone. > > > > Since there seems to be as much consensus about this as there ever is, I > > went ahead and made the change. > > > > "For reasonable-sized classes, put all the fields together, at the top, > > immediately after any necessary typedefs. For unreasonably large classes, > > do whatever seems best (but let's try to avoid making more of these)." > > > > https://wiki.mozilla.org/JavaScript:SpiderMonkey:Coding_Style#Classes > > Is there a definition of "reasonable-sized" ? > > Thanks > Sylvestre > _______________________________________________ > dev-tech-js-engine-internals mailing list > dev-tech-js-engine-internals@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-internals > _______________________________________________ dev-tech-js-engine-internals mailing list dev-tech-js-engine-internals@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-internals
