On 2008.01.16., at 20:53, Norris Boyd wrote: > And I would certainly support moving to one of the Java collection > classes in ScriptableObject as long as there wasn't a negative > performance impact.
I can't imagine there'd be. Especially if we allowed people to somehow plug in a Map factory (we discussed this somewhere already about a year ago), so people could plug in a Map implementation of their choosing -- i.e. the Trove project provides open addressing implementation similar to what Rhino uses now. People could also choose between a HashMap and ConcurrentHashMap based on the concurrency expectations of their data model. And so on. Anyway -- I guess since you've been around the project since its initiation, you'd probably be the most qualified to touch that code, as it is a rather central piece of the library. Attila. _______________________________________________ dev-tech-js-engine-rhino mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-rhino
