On Feb 15, 11:53 am, Attila Szegedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First off, your example is syntactically incorrect. In JavaScript, the
> catch syntax is:
>
> catch(e) {
>
> }
>
> not
>
> catch(exeption e) {
>
> }
>
> Actually, even in Java you'd use "Exception" (capital "E", and with a
> "c" after "x"), not "exeption".
>
> I have no idea what's wrong, and would need a self-contained
> reproducible testcase (with all objects available). Can you produce
> one? Are you using interpreted or compiled mode?
>
> Attila.
>
> On 2008.02.15., at 19:26, Rhino user wrote:
>
> > I am posting this message again. Sorry about that . Just to make sure
> > that it gets read.
>
> > Also , I tried this with the latest RC build which Norris posted
> > yesterday .The message is slightly different but the problem remains.
> > Hi ,
> > I have a script like his
> > try{
> > var f = this.getOCGS();
> > }
>
> > catch(exeption e){
> > logger.println(e);;
>
> > }
>
> > logger is equivalent of System.out in java.
> > I have a scriptable object Doc which is the toplevel object referred
> > to as this.
> > The getOCGs() method throws a runtime exception . So I would expect
> > that the system.out will print that error but instaed it throws an
> > error saying that
> > TypeError: Method "getOCGs" called on incompatible object.
> > If I remove the try- catch block the right error gets thrown.
> > what can be wrong?
> > Thanks
well , that was my mistake. the javascript has correct syntax.
I will try to create a test case and send .
Thanks
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine-rhino mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-rhino
