Attila Szegedi wrote: > ... > Yeah, this could work without too much complexity -- just stash > somewhere the last identifier encountered within the current statement > (null it on statement boundary), and use that as the function name.
thanks to confirm that it wouldn't be a technical problem. What do you think of such a feature? Would you welcome it in the code base? Cheers, Marc. -- Web: http://www.efficient-webtesting.com Blog: http://mguillem.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ dev-tech-js-engine-rhino mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-rhino
