Well, if not some formal grammar at least something informal to look at. Anything other than source code really...
I don't want the grammar to generate my own parser, I'm fine with Rhino's. What I need the grammar mostly for is to know what to expect in the AST. Some AST documentation would also fit my needs probably. --emi On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Attila Szegedi <[email protected]> wrote: > The grammar of ECMA-262 spec is cruelly hard to represent in any kind of a > regular grammar used by normal parser generators. That's why you don't > really encounter these :-) > > Attila. > > > On 2009.08.25., at 15:58, Emilian Bold wrote: > > Hy, >> >> I would like to know if we have some proper grammar for the parser used in >> Rhino. It seems to be a direct port of the C variant, which also doesn't >> look to have some grammar by my quick look into the Firefox repository. >> >> The ECMA specification does seem to provide some grammar but I would like >> to >> know specifically Rhino's. Part of the reason is to see who maps to what >> in >> Rhino and to know what to expect in the AST (which I use directly when >> needed). >> >> --emi >> > -- Emilian Bold http://www.emilianbold.ro :Java and NetBeans Platform-loving development from Timisoara, Romania. http://www.josekibold.ro : Java / iPhone development. _______________________________________________ dev-tech-js-engine-rhino mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-rhino
