On 6/20/06, Foteos Macrides <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IMHO we are still many years away from the day when the great majority of
browsers actually in use will have the same serializer with both the
behavior AND object names of a W3C standard, and even then there will be the
issue of "heritage" documents on the web. Whatever one's personal feeling
might be about one organization versus another, I don't see why one
organization's "proprietary" objects should be considered sufficient.
This is a "portability" issue, not a "capability" issue.
Ok, so in that case, maybe you should raise this on the whatwg mailing list?
You want a .xml property similar to the .xml property of Internet Exlorer, then?
Regards,
Martijn
Regards,
Fote
--
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-layout mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-layout mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout
