Chris Hubick wrote:
I thought intrinsic width was only used in the 'auto' case?
Intrinsic min width is also needed for tables because they're not allowed to overflow...
When you explicitly set the width on a block-level replaced element in such a fashion, does that not imply that any intrinsic width has thus been overridden and will be ignored?
Not for tables.
I would expect the width of the image to be scaled up or down to 80px
This is the question. Should it be? On trunk it is; on reflow branch it currently is not.
I thought about it some more, and it seems that what we may really want is for IntrinsicForContainer to report a min of 0 for percentage widths (or at least percentage widths of replaced elements?). And there's already an XXX comment to this effect.
-Boris _______________________________________________ dev-tech-layout mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout
