Boris Zbarsky wrote: > Jonas Sicking wrote: >> I really think the callback is the way to go for web authors. And I >> really don't think it's that big of a hassle for implementors, though >> I'd defer to bz on that. We deal with callbacks all the time, and we >> always will. > > For what it's worth, I think the callback was a bigger hassle for the > spec writer (have to think of all the things that could go wrong) than > for me as an implementor (have to think of all the things that could go > wrong, but have more experience at it).
Yeah, this was my impression too. It all seemed to fail when debating error handling more or less extreme edge cases that users of the spec rarely would care about. > For now I'm implementing selectors API without namespace support, in any > case. I sort of think that we should go with the resolver approach and then let the spec catch up with us. We would have to be prepared to make some changes to the implementation, but that's fine, it would unlikely be in areas that would cause a lot of breakage anyway. But we can always add it later too of course. / Jonas _______________________________________________ dev-tech-layout mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout
