Boris Zbarsky wrote:
Boris Zbarsky wrote:1) Allow whitespace-only Text frames as kids of rows, rowgroups, colgroups, tables. On mutation of the text in a textframe with such a kid, reframe the containing block. 2) Don't create such frames, but mark the content nodes involved somehow so that mutations to them reframe the containing block.I think I'll go with (2) unless someone sees a reason not to. We have free bits on nodes, and it's a lot simpler to do than the other, in the near term.
My main concern is that we are slowly eating up the bits in nodes. Though I suspect that we can crunch away a few if needed. And adding another word dedicated to flags would probably not be a big deal.
There's also the concern that this types of layout bits (dbaron added similar ones when adding support for :nth-of-type etc) we will have a much harder time supporting multiple views for a single document. However I think rocs various posts on that issue has convinced me that that is unlikely something that we'll want to do anytime soon.
/ Jonas _______________________________________________ dev-tech-layout mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout
