On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:20 AM, Xidorn Quan <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Robert O'Callahan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Xidorn Quan <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> However, ::backdrop cannot be implemented that way, becasue any > >> element can go fullscreen, which means the frame of the fullscreen > >> element can be video, image, or iframe. Those frame are not container > >> frame, and thus cannot be a parent frame. > > > > > > nsVideoFrame is a container frame. > > > > How about we make nsImageFrame and nsSubdocumentFrame inherit from > > nsContainerFrame? > > Well, any HTML element can enter fullscreen. Does that mean we would > make all possible frame inherit from nsContainerFrame? > > Hmmm, it seems most of them already have been. The left ones, as far > as I can see, are: image, subdocument, form control, and br. (It seems > table col does not become a normal block as expected. I'll have a look > at it.) Do we want all of them to inherit from nsContainerFrame? > Sure! There are text frames, but they're not elements and can't be fullscreen I hope! It looks like the easiest approach. I'm not quite comfortable with it, > though. FWIW that would bloat those frames by four pointers. > I don't think it matters for those frame types. Rob -- lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr rdn rdsme,anea lurpr edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf toD selthor stor edna siewaoeodm or v sstvr esBa kbvted,t rdsme,aoreseoouoto o l euetiuruewFa kbn e hnystoivateweh uresyf tulsa rehr rdm or rnea lurpr .a war hsrer holsa rodvted,t nenh hneireseoouot.tniesiewaoeivatewt sstvr esn _______________________________________________ dev-tech-layout mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout
