Rich Megginson wrote:
Moving to Mercurial is fine with me. I've been using git now for quite
:-)
some time and have really grown to like how much better it is than CVS.
I understand hg is similar to git. As far as the repo layout, it
Yes, afaik.
doesn't matter to me if the c-sdk has its own top level repo or is part
of a larger repo, as long as it is easy to
1) checkout just the c-sdk
2) build just the c-sdk
3) tag individual and separate c-sdk releases
4) produce individual source code releases of the c-sdk
Then you do want a separate c-sdk repo.
(And you can use the repoNestedRepositories/subrepos feature on top of
it, if need be: see my previous message.)
Then it should be much like what was done for DOMi and Venkman:
import with (some) history.
Time to confirm the filed bug?
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-ldap mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-ldap
