Christian Biesinger wrote:
This flag sounds like a good idea to me (although I'm not sure why the
external protocol handler needs it).
Because we have no idea what security level to give to URIs from it.
It probably needs a better
description though... What does "having an inherent security context"
mean really?
Well. For HTTP, you have a host and port that you're assuming represent
someone.
In general Gecko terms, it's a question of whether a principal generated from
that URI is meaningful. But I don't want to put that language in the interface,
of course. I'd love wording suggestions.
-Boris
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-network mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-network
