For those not following the WHATWG thread --- there's interest in adding
an asynchronous transactional API for localStorage, but less interest in
breaking compatibility with the existing API. There's quite a bit of
discussion about what properties the transactional API should have.
Also it seems to me that the global storage mutex can be implemented
with a per-domain mutex; we should be able to avoid all situations where
script in one domain synchronously triggers script in another domain
while holding the storage mutex.
Rob
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-network mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-network
