Hi,
As part of the Snappy effort, we asked QA to compare cache effectiveness
of Firefox against Opera (which some people claim has a superior cache).
We have some preliminary data now.
The testplan is described at
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Performance/Snappy/Testing:BFCache_Sprint#Reference_Test_Case
I put up a snapshot of the results at
http://people.mozilla.com/~tglek/snappy/cache1.html
I was suspecting that our cache hit-rates may be worse, but the data
proved that theory wrong.
Data indicates that either writing to our cache is expensive or we are
not http-pipelining/etc properly. My theory is that disk cache is to
blame, so I asked QA to rerun this comparing to Firefox to Firefox with
disk cache disabled.
There is also something horrible going on with huffingtonpost.
Taras
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-network mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-network
