On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Brian Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > User-Agent is the only header that Necko team would say good riddance to, > AFAICT.
I think it would make sense to carefully police additions to HTTP headers beyond User-Agent. (Also removals, I guess, from the site compat perspective.) Proposals to add stuff pop up from time to time and they tend to flop with the request left bloated. (Notable exception: Accept-Encoding: gzip. DNT: 1 seems to be off to a good start, too, but it's too early to tell what happens to it on the long term.) One failure that added bloat that I'm partially guilty for is the Accept header. Wouldn't you say good riddance to Accept if we could as far as site compat goes? -- Henri Sivonen [email protected] http://hsivonen.iki.fi/ _______________________________________________ dev-tech-network mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-network
