Hi, gwtc:
I visited the site before, but we don't like the generic activeX
wrapper. The reason is that it will dramatically increase web client
development complexity. We want to keep web client/javascript code as same
as possible for both IE and mozilla browsers. The second problem is the
secuity problem. We have own ways to secure data communications without
adding setting security complexity at client side.
Thanks a lot for your help..
Regards
"gwtc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> yekerui wrote:
>> Hi, All:
>> I am porting a number of IE activeX control to Mozilla browsers by
>> use of XPCOM. Our activeX com controls are written using either Visual
>> C++ 6 or Visual C++ 2003. I like to merge xpcom C++ codes with activeX
>> com control code which was written from visual C++ 2003. Merging two
>> piceces of codes helps us easily distribute dlls. However, I have met a
>> problem that firefox can see the plugin written from Visual C++ 6, but
>> the plugin merged with Visual C++ 2003 and activeX com control can not be
>> seen from firefox. I have worked with the problem for more than 10 hours,
>> but can not find a trick leading the problem. I searched the problem for
>> a long time, but no clues can help me out.
>> Looking foward to your help!!!! Thanks a lot in advance!!!
>>
>>
> a lot of people won't use active-x with a Mozilla product.
>
> there already is an active-x plugin avaiable:
> http://www.iol.ie/~locka/mozilla/plugin.htm
>
> you might want to ask your question in one of the Mozilla developers
> newsgroups on the news://news.mozilla.org news server. One could be
> mozilla.dev.tech.xpcom. Look around the server for others.
>
> --
> Witty Words of Wisdom: Accept that some days you're the pigeon, and some
> days you're the statue.
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-xpcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-xpcom
