Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'm interested in adopting standalone XPCOM for  creating cross
> > platform software and so far from the experiments that I've done it's
> > going to do the job.  The only additional criteria that I have is that
> > I need for the components to be accessible from Java applications.
> > I've been looking for answers to whether one can use JavaXPCOM with
> > standalone XPCOM.
> >
> > I've been building standalone XPCOM on windows by configuring it this:
> > ./configure --enable-standalone-modules=xpcom --enable-javaxpcom
> > --enable-application=standalone
> >
> > but when I try to enable javaxpcom via:
> >
> > ./configure --enable-standalone-modules=xpcom --enable-javaxpcom
> > --enable-application=standalone
> >
> > I find that the makefiles for javaxpcom are not being generated (they
> > are when configuring for xulrunner).
> >
> > Does anyone know what the story is?  Is using JavaXPCOM for interfacing
> > Java clients to standalone XPCOM possible?
>
> JavaXPCOM is not designed to work with standalone XPCOM, and indeed
> standalone XPCOM is mostly a dead project (certainly not actively
> maintained). Is there a particular reason you don't want to use the standard
> XULRunner runtime that has JavaXPCOM builtin?
>
> --BDS

I was only avoiding the xulrunner build because I was not interested in
creating a mozilla app and just wanted to use XPCOM as a cross platform
component framework.

Will building the xulrunner runtime allow me to use xpcom as a
framework without requiring to embed mozilla in some way?

Best regards,

Martin

_______________________________________________
dev-tech-xpcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-xpcom

Reply via email to