Benjamin Smedberg wrote: > I'm not sure why people keep using this tutorial (perhaps because there's > nothing better), but it is wrong in many ways. In particular, it is using > the standalone glue (-DXPCOM_GLUE) for components, which is not recommended. > See http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/XPCOM_Glue > > --BDS
The best thing anyone can do for XULRunner/XPCOM acceptance is to provide a great example XPCOM component that WORKS with XULRunner. Personally, after lots of problem-solving and guessing, I've given up on writing a XPCOM component for XULRunner. The current examples just don't work, and I can't figure out why. I'll come back to XULRunner/XPCOM after there are some better examples that are well documented and work. --Kevin _______________________________________________ dev-tech-xpcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-xpcom
