[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is it possible to build xpcom without the unnecessary dependencies? If > so how?
You could try to build with --enable-application=xpcom and see what happens. I'm pretty sure nobody has tested it in a long time, so you may need to hack the makefiles (and that's not easy). > At this point, I am ready to abandon any attempt to use xpcom, since > it does not seem to be independent enough, which is unfortunate. Standalone XPCOM is not really a high priority goal. If people want to maintain it, I'll accept patches (and even perhaps provide some clues on IRC), but expect life to be a bit lonely. --BDS _______________________________________________ dev-tech-xpcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-xpcom
