On 3/13/07, Joshua Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Just another question, I don't know if this is the correct place to ask
it,
but is there a easier way to implement C++ code than having to make a
XPCOM
component? When I look at it, XPCOM may be a bit overkill for what I need,
but I will use it if there isn't any other choice.


If your extension is not complex enough, or you don't have to hide anything
in your code(though it is useless to hide) you can code entirely in
JavaScript. One step ahead, you can even have a JavaScript/Python/Other
XPCOM components instead of C++.

HTH,
--
Rajendra Prasad Murakonda,
http://prodizy.livejournal.com/
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-xpcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-xpcom

Reply via email to