Does anyone happen to recall how the performance parameters of PLDHashTable and PLHashTable compare? I seem to recall something about PLDHashTable being more efficient in terms of memory usage and PLHashTable being faster, but I could be wrong... and it could depend on the exact
The reason I ask is that if what I recall is correct it might make sense to use PLHashTable for "temporary" hashtables (e.g. the GCTable in the cycle collector), no? -Boris _______________________________________________ dev-tech-xpcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-xpcom
