Thanks for the quick response, for the moment we'll just have a local version of the 1.0-SNAPSHOT so we can apply our patch that was on a class that ended up going away (Operation.java).
The original issue is in the message below, let me know if this looks like something that can make it into 1.1. --Josh ----- Forwarded Message ---- *From:* Nagesh Susarla <*[email protected]*> *To:* *[email protected] **Sent:* Thu, March 26, 2009 12:23:06 PM *Subject:* i18n Template Neg operator impl Hi, Firstly let me say that the URITemplate impl is great and works great for us. Recently I came across an issue with the -neg operator which seems to deviates from the spec. The spec states the following: * http://bitworking.org/projects/URI-Templates/spec/draft-gregorio-uritemplate-02.txt * 3.3.2. The 'neg' operator If all of the variables are un-defined or empty then substitute the value of arg, otherwise substitute the empty string. Template t = new Template("*http://cnn.com/{-neg|all|foo,bar}";*); Map m = new HashMap(); m.put("foo", "value"); String out = t.expand(m); out => *http://cnn.com/all * Note that the output returns "all" inspite of one of the variables being declared. If I read correctly, it should return "*http://cnn.com*"; instead of "*http://cnn.com/all*"; Can you please confirm that this is a bug or point me to the correct spec? After debugging this a bit, it looks like this can be fixed with the following diff (I'm looking at the sources from abdera-i18n-1.0-20090105.215721-1-sources.jar) --- ./org/apache/abdera/i18n/templates/Operation.java 2008-12-19 12:54:26.000000000 -0800 +++ ./patch/Operation.java 2009-03-25 17:39:18.000000000 -0700 @@ -528,9 +528,9 @@ public String evaluate(String var, String arg, Context context) { String[] vardefs = var.split("\\s*,\\s*"); for (String v : vardefs) { - if (!isdefined(v,context)) return arg; + if (isdefined(v,context)) return null; } - return null; + return arg; } public void explain(String var, String arg, Appendable buf) throws IOException { buf.append("If ["); Let me know if you'd like me to file a bug. thanks, Nagesh ------ End of Forwarded Message On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 2:21 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Josh Gordineer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Our project used to depend on the following location but I see that it > has > > been removed: > > > > > http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/abdera/abdera-i18n/1.0-SNAPSHOT/abdera-i18n-1.0-SNAPSHOT.pom > > > > We had a patch for a piece of functionality that was not working as > defined > > by the URI templates (We've previously submitted a bug for this to be > fixed > > but doesn't look like it has been in 1.1 We had also asked for that to be > > fixed in the next release which does not look like it is fixed either - I > > can forward that info if you are interested). > > > > My question is why would the 1.0 snapshot be deleted which would force > > people to upgrade to the latest (1.1) even though (such as in our case) > > there are reasons why you would not want to upgrade. > > > > Thanks.. > > Josh > > > > I don't know for sure what happened but i do know that "they" do > delete old snapshots sometimes, otherwise the snapshot repo would > become enormous. So perhaps that one was just deleted as 1.0 has been > release and the snapshot repo now has 1.1 snapshots. > > We're about to do a 1.1 release, i'd be very happy to try to get > whatever fix or patch you have into that so you can depend on a > reliable non-snapshot release - what is the JIRA for the bug you have > reported? > > ...ant >
