On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 9:19 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Andreas Veithen > <[email protected]> wrote: >> In previous releases there were issues with the OSGi integration, such >> as ABDERA-281. Apparently, this pushed ServiceMix to repackage Abdera >> and to provide their own custom bundle(s). They did that in an >> incorrect way and were then forced to repackage Axiom as well. That >> really pisses me off because their "rogue" Axiom bundle violates some >> basic design principles behind Axiom; see SMX4-877. Shouldn't we take >> the time to add a minimal test case to Abdera to ensure the quality of >> the OSGi bundles, so that we don't give any excuse to ServiceMix to >> produce custom bundles? >> >> I recently overhauled the Axiom OSGi tests (using Pax Exam) and I'm >> ready to set up a test module for Abdera, but I need somebody who >> volunteers to write some test code (that executes some basic Abdera >> features to check that the bundles work). >> >> Andreas >> >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:35, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >>> The user from ABDERA-290 was asking to get the fix out in a release so >>> i've spun a 1.1.3 release for that and all the other trunk changes >>> since 1.1.2, which includes quite a lot of fixes that Christine has >>> got done. So please review and vote on the Abdera 1.1.3 release >>> artifacts. Going straight to a vote rather than a review first but if >>> there are any changes or updates anyone wants just say and we can >>> respin an RC2 for those. >>> >>> See the CHANGES file for a list of whats been updated in this release: >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/abdera/java/tags/abdera-1.1.3-RC1/CHANGES >>> >>> The binary and source distributions are available at: >>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/abdera/1.1.3-RC1/ >>> >>> The Maven artifacts are at: >>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/abdera/1.1.3-RC1/maven >>> >>> The SVN tag for the release is at: >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/abdera/java/tags/abdera-1.1.3-RC1/ >>> >>> +1 from me. >>> >>> ...ant >>> >> > > Andreas, I have some more time now and that sounds really useful and > 'd be happy to help you do this. > > I would still like to get this 1.1.3 release out too though if > possible as there was a user waiting for a released fix, happy to do a > 1.1.4 quickly too once we get the OSGi tests done. > > So, anyone have another +1 vote on this 1.1.3 so I could release it? > > ...ant
Still need one more +1 to get this released... ...ant
