Eric, Where would the proxy service run? I.e. how would it be deployed? As a standalone server? Or bundled with each tablet server, etc?
I think this approach might be the easiest from a maintenance and integration standpoint. Is your proxy code published anywhere? --Jason On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Eric Newton <[email protected]> wrote: > Alternatively, you can create a Proxy service, which has a simple thrift > API, which would use the java client library. > > This is ACCUMULO-482. > > I wrote one once, but it didn't get much use, and died due to lack of > attention. > > -Eric > > On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Jason Trost <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I noticed that there are no JIRAs for a python client >> interface/lib/API for Accumulo. How involved would it be to develop >> AND maintain a python client for Accumulo? >> >> I realize that Jython can be used, but I am interested in a native >> python lib that can be use more broadly with systems that don't work >> with Jython. >> >> In order to do this, it seems like we would need to: >> 1. generate the python thrift bindings code (this is trivial) >> 2. develop and maintain the python glue code to use the thrift code >> and python zookeeper code to interact with the various accumulo >> components. The current Java "glue" code looks quite long. How often >> does this code change (in terms of new features or changes in >> protocol, not bug fixes)? >> >> Ideally the python API would be very similar to the Java interface >> (Connector, Instance, Scanner, BatchScanner, BatchWriter, Key, Value, >> Mutation, etc). >> >> I guess what I am trying to get at is, does the Accumulo dev community >> think it's worth the time and effort to develop and maintain a python >> API? I personally think it is in order to help with adoption and >> integration with other systems (Django is the primary system I want to >> be able to use with it). I have some time to help this along, but I >> don't think I have enough time to take this on alone. Is anyone else >> interested in working together on this? >> >> Thanks, >> >> --Jason >>
