<sigh> Which your presentation explained basically on the next slide ... I should have read more.
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Adam Fuchs <[email protected]> wrote: > FATE is really designed to provide low frequency atomic operations across > distributed subcomponents components, rather than the high-speed > transactions across distributed partitions that Foundation DB supports. > Performance in terms of transactions per second is limited with FATE, and > certainly doesn't scale linearly as the cluster grows. > > Adam > > > On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 12:00 PM, David Medinets > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I went to a talk about Foundation DB the other day. They said that >> Foundation DB was the only NoSQL tool with transactions. But then I >> thought, does FATE serve as a transaction boundary ... at least for >> Mutations? >>
