I did try to use that method. The Property.LOAD_BALANCER that I used was not changed when the LoadTableBalancer class retrieved it from the TableConfigurations. Then I looked at the source code in TableOperationsImpl. setTableProperty does something through the Thrift interface. Would that work for unit testing? Either way, I don't see how the Thift calls eventually set the property into a TableConfiguration object.
I can add some plumbing needed for dependency injection. Doing so seems fairly harmless. On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:10 PM, John Vines <[email protected]> wrote: > Are you looking for connector.TableOperations().setTableProperty? > > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:09 PM, David Medinets > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I am looking for a way to set the table configuration. I see 122 >> references to getTableConfiguration but 0 to setTableConfiguration. >> There is one usage of "new TableConfiguration" which seems to create >> an empty configuration. Have I missed something? >>
