Because emulating the same behavior as start-all allows us to test the client wait behavior. I would rather see the stop behavior changed to be more like stop-all, in that it waits for it to be fully up before shutting down.
Sent from my phone, please pardon the typos and brevity. On Feb 10, 2013 11:28 PM, "David Medinets" <[email protected]> wrote: > But if people start using the MiniAccumuloCluster without knowing > their client processing need to wait? What's the harm in letting > start() do the waiting? Wouldn't that ensure a minimum wait time and > consistent behavior? > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:23 PM, John Vines <[email protected]> wrote: > > I don't think so, all of our client processes are designed to wait a bit > > for the server to come up, and this process a similar behavior as our > > start-all script. > > > > Sent from my phone, please pardon the typos and brevity. > > On Feb 10, 2013 10:59 PM, "David Medinets" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Adding a Thread.sleep(1) after the start() method does seem to > >> consistently resolve the 'Stream Closed' issue. > >> > >> MiniAccumuloCluster la = new MiniAccumuloCluster(tmpDir, > "pass1234"); > >> la.start(); > >> Thread.sleep(1); > >> > >> Which raises a question. Should the start method wait for the > >> processes to start before returning? Any reason I shouldn't create a > >> jira ticket for this? > >> > >> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Jim Klucar <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > I wonder if it is just because you're starting and stopping so > quickly. I > >> > know the Tserver processes take a second to come up, perhaps put a > sleep > >> in > >> > for a few seconds and see if that works. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:40 PM, David Medinets < > [email protected] > >> >wrote: > >> > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1058 > >> >> > >> >> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Christopher <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> >> > Should probably have documentation and a working example prior to > >> 1.5.0. > >> >> Is there already a ticket for it? > >> >> > >> >
