How are you expecting to get results back? Guava's Iterables could concat a bunch of a Scanners together, if you didn't care about the throughput aspect of it and simply wanted results from multiple tables.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Adam Fuchs <[email protected]> wrote: > Is anyone else pining for a multi-table isolated batch scanner, or is it > just me? I like the automatic parallelism and balancing of the batch > scanner, but I'm looking to maintain server-side state in my iterators over > long-running scans. I would also like to scan over multiple tables > concurrently. Has anyone tried hacking something together with a pool of > non-batch scanners? > > Adam >
