There is a setscaniter shell command that I had missed. Thanks, David L!
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:39 AM, David Medinets <[email protected]>wrote: > Yes. But it seems like anything accessing that table also uses that > iterator. > > > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:49 AM, John Vines <[email protected]> wrote: > >> You can declare iterators to use at scan time. >> >> Sent from my phone, please pardon the typos and brevity. >> On May 9, 2013 9:48 AM, "David Medinets" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > I'm asking in case I missed something in the documentation. This issue >> > hasn't arisen before since I haven't shared tables before. When I >> attach an >> > iterator to a table in the shell, it affects everyone (and every >> process) >> > that accesses that table. Is there a standard of practice? Do people >> clone >> > tables before developing new iterators or before exploring data with >> > existing iterators? >> > >> > >
