On 6/5/13 10:51 AM, Keith Turner wrote:
>>Can you give more detail about "history is easily mucked up"? I am
>>curious
>>what constitutes a mucked up history and what sequence of steps lead to
>>this?
>>
>> http://dan.bravender.us/2011/**10/20/Why_cherry-picking_**
>should_not_be_part_of_a_**normal_git_workflow.html<http://dan.bravender.us/2011/10/20/Why_cherry-picking_should_not_be_part_of_a_normal_git_workflow.html>
Thanks for the link, I do not think I could have easily found this via
google because I would not have know what to search for. I have little
experience w/ git outside of small projects on github w/ one branch. Info
like this helps me make informed decisions. Cherry picking vs merging
seems to be at the heart of what you are talking about, are there any other
key concepts?
Cherry-pick and merging is definitely important. There are likely
others, but none immediately come to mind.
Would probably be good to add this link, plus the other useful links posed
in this thread, to the document you are working on. I can make that change
if you put it somewhere.
Yep, that's currently the plan. I'll throw it up in SVN tonight. (how meta)
