On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jun 12, 2013 4:21 PM, "Christopher" <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: [snip] >> I did read the whole thing. I would like to see a place for the >> scenarios I contributed, but other than that, I think it's a >> sufficient plan for transition. > > Are you planning to update it yourself or would you like me to? If you'd > like me to, please refresh my mind on the specifics :)
Specifically, the scenarios in the suggestions file I attached to ACCUMULO-1498: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12586445/ctubbsii-git-suggestions.v1.txt I'd prefer you do it, just so a second pair of eyes can take a look and verify that the scenarios I describe match what you've already documented. Keep in mind that the example scenarios might grow (such as the scenario Mike Drob described above, and I'm sure there will be more we'll encounter and want to document as we make mistakes)... I don't know if that warrants a separate page, or just a dedicated section for "scenarios". [snip] > Does anyone feel we need to call a vote on this plan? I feel lazy consensus > is good enough given our previous poll on wanting to move to git in the > first place. Lazy consensus is probably sufficient, but if it helps, I say, +1 on moving forward with tickets. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
