> It would be very nice if the types you mentioned were more consistent > across the API. Personally I would like to see byte[] and ByteSequence > fully supported across all of the APIs related to reading and writing data. > We added support for byte[] to mutation in 1.5. Thinking back, we should > have added support for ByteSequence too.
+1. If we make everything tie back to ByteSequence and make the serialization/deserialization logic pluggable, then everyone will be happy. Do you have any ideas based on the sketch I included that would help make this better for all types, not just byte[]?
