Somewhat related, it would be cool to get Jenkins reviewing patches that are attached to issues (HDFS is an example I think).
Im not sure of all the functionality that review board provides, but I'm all for having a more integrated system (regardless of what the actual tool is to begin). On Sep 27, 2013 7:00 AM, "Mike Drob" <[email protected]> wrote: > Was about to chime in with reviews.a.o, when I saw Sean beat me to it. It's > mostly that and patches attached to tickets. Pull requests coming from > github might also work, but I don't think anybody's tried them yet. > > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Right now, if they're done they'd use the apache infra provided review > > board. > > > > https://reviews.apache.org/ > > > > Or devs just trading patches. > > > > -- > > Sean > > On Sep 27, 2013 8:41 AM, "Bill Havanki" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Noob question: are code reviews normally done now? > > > > > > I've never used gerrit, but I'd be happy to try it. I've used Crucible > in > > > the past and liked it. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:29 PM, David Medinets > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/ > > > > > > > > > >
