I have yet to hear any objections from the rest of the devs and I have no issues with it as well. Unless anyone speaks up, I'll probably commit it early next week.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Michael Berman <[email protected]> wrote: > What about ACCUMULO-1009? Discussion seems to have settled down; no one > has told me there's anything wrong with the latest patch. Should 1.6 have > SSL support? > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:58 PM, John Vines <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I chimed in on 802, there are a few items (API and error related) that >> should be resolved because if the feature ISN'T completed by release time, >> we'll have issues going forward. >> >> 210 - I need a better idea of what the remaining 5% is, but if it means >> moving packages around, particularly client packages, I would hold off for >> the same reason as above. >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > I'm wondering if it would be prudent to go ahead and merge in the >> > ACCUMULO-210 and ACCUMULO-802 work, knowing it's only 95% complete, or >> > to push it at the last minute as I polish them up. >> > >> > -- >> > Christopher L Tubbs II >> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:37 PM, John Vines <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > This is just a friendly reminder to the community that we have a >> slated >> > > code freeze for November 1. That gives us just two weeks until that >> > > deadline. >> > >> > >
