I'd love help getting it ready... I've just rebase'd my GitHub copy of the ACCUMULO-802 branch (/ctubbsii/accumulo) off of asf/master, if you want to go off that.
-- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:32 PM, John Vines <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm concerned about having a partial implementation in 1.6 and then driving > ourselves crazy trying to fix the API for it in 1.7 because we half assed > in. In the ticket I think there are 2 items which we need to address before > bringing it in which would make it awful to fix in future releases do to > behavior changes. But I don't think they're that bad to fix either. > > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ah, I didn't go to the issues last week -- didn't realize that 802 was the >> namespaces. >> >> Have we prioritized what needs to be addressed? Can Christopher get 210 >> done? >> >> I feel like we're looking a gift horse in the mouth for not getting 802 to >> a good state, but I also don't want to get in a position where we have to >> do a huge revert because we find something terrible with it in testing. I >> don't know. >> >> >> On 10/23/13 10:00 AM, John Vines wrote: >> >>> Christopher brought this up in the code freeze thread last week. My stance >>> is it shouldn't be merged in until the 1.6 necessities get wrapped. I >>> don't >>> have the cycles to give it that TLC though. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/ACCUMULO-802<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/ACCUMULO-802> >>>> <https**://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/ACCUMULO-802<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-802> >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> I noticed that the namespace code that Sean worked on never got finished >>>> and committed. Reading through the above ticket, it looks like we're >>>> fairly >>>> close to a minimum acceptable level of functionality for 1.6 (John sums >>>> up >>>> most of these in the most recent comment). >>>> >>>> I'd like to try to get this merged in. What does everyone else think? >>>> >>>> >>>
