On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 5:08 PM, John Vines <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am concerned about the tickets around 118, as there seem to be a fair > amount of blockers revolving around it. What's the status of those? > I am currently working through them. Working on the garbage collector one at the moment. > > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Keith Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Encryption (rest+motion), Conditional Mutations, Root tablet in its own > > > table (instead of !METADATA), MiniAccumuloCluster improvements, Shell > > > improvements (jcommander related), lots of other bug-fixes/improvements > > and > > > updates to recent Hadoop versions. > > > > > > > Also ACCUMULO-118 and ACCUMULO-1451 > > > > > > > > > > Those are what pop out at me. > > > > > > > > > On 10/25/13 12:49 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > > > > > >> Does anyone know off the top of their head the feature(s) that caused > > 1.6 > > >> to be planned as a major release in the first place? > > >> > > >> I see ~180 resolved issues in jira, but we don't appear to have a > > shortcut > > >> for flagging things as breaking. > > >> > > >> > > >> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Christopher <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> I don't mind putting things off to 1.7 (if necessary). But... if > 1.6.0 > > >>> isn't sufficiently feature rich, there's not really a reason to > > >>> release it just yet... until those features are ready. That said, I > do > > >>> think there'll be enough features in 1.6.0 to release it as a minor > > >>> release, if we're interpreting the version as the standard > > >>> <major>.<minor>.<bugfix> scheme, even if we end up pushing some stuff > > >>> off to 1.7. > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Christopher L Tubbs II > > >>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> True, but at the same time it makes no sense to release 1.6.0 if the > > >>>> features contained within are incomplete. > > >>>> > > >>>> There are still a number of blockers that are unresolved that would > > all > > >>>> > > >>> fall > > >>> > > >>>> into the category of creating a broken 1.6.0 or having to back out > > large > > >>>> changesets. I know these blockers would be categorized as "bug > fixes" > > >>>> and > > >>>> not "features", but some of these bugs are directly from new > features > > >>>> > > >>> which > > >>> > > >>>> I would argue are thus still a part of this feature. > > >>>> > > >>>> I'm all for trying to release early and often, but I will be the guy > > who > > >>>> throws a wrench in the works if we do it at the sake of reducing the > > >>>> > > >>> quality > > >>> > > >>>> of our release. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On 10/25/13 11:49 AM, John Vines wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I'd rather not go down the slippery slope we went down last time. > > I'll > > >>>>> gladly be the bad guy and say that things are getting pushed to > 1.7. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Christopher <[email protected]> > > >>>>> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> > > >>>>> It looks like we're 50% in terms of tickets complete. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> http://s.apache.org/accumulo-**1.6.0-issues< > > http://s.apache.org/accumulo-1.6.0-issues> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Extensions are always nice, but I'm not going to be the bad guy > and > > >>>>>> ask for one :) > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -- > > >>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II > > >>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 12:33 PM, John Vines <[email protected]> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Alright folks, we're down to the wire. Feature freeze is one week > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> away. > > >>> > > >>>> > > >>>>>> If > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> anyone has any last minute concerns about this schedule, please > > speak > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> up > > >>> > > >>>> now. Otherwise, have a great weekend! > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >
