On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:02 PM, John Vines <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> So, I am proposing maintaining the feature freeze of Friday at midnight >> that we maintained before, EXCEPT for any thing regarding these 4-5 >> features I've enumerated. I think an additional week should be sufficient >> for these features to be in a release worthy state. This also means that >> after the general feature freeze date, all non-critical bugs and >> additional >> features will be bumped to 1.6.1/1.7.0). Because it is a one week >> timespan, >> I think we can hold off on creating the branch for 1.6.0-SNAPSHOT, but if >> anyone disagrees a second vote can be put in order by someone who feels >> that way. >> > > Can we get some idea of scope for "any thing regarding these [...] > features"? > > Could we limit it to tickets that currently exist as subtasks of the list > of top level features? > This was my intent when I said "any thing regarding these [...] features". I perceive that any additional tickets that should come up from those features would be bugs or features worth coming in down the road. > > Could the people currently assigned to those tickets confirm that a week > is a realistic goal? > Agreed. In addition, if they could scope sub-tasks into must haves vs. nice to haves for a release, that would be beneficial as well. > > -- > Sean >
