In code reviews, I referred to the following article (I believe is the same as the Chinese version) which isn't there anymore: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jtp05236/index.html
The following search returned nothing: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/?sort_by=&show_abstract=true&show_all=&search_flag=&contentarea_by=Java+technology&search_by=InterruptedException&topic_by=-1&industry_by=-1&type_by=All+Types&ibm-search=Search However, code speaks by itself. I often refer people to: 清单 3. 捕捉 InterruptedException 后恢复中断状态 which says "restore interrupt status after catchingInterruptedException" Cheers On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: > It was pointed out to me by a colleague that we're not properly > handling InterruptedException in many places. > > He cited this article (I could only find it in Chinese, but Google > Translate works quite well converting it to English): > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/cn/java/j-jtp05236.html > > One place we do this a lot is UtilWaitThread. Should we be concerned > about this? How do we want to address it? > > (Also, does anybody have a link to the English version of that article?) > > -- > Christopher L Tubbs II > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >
