+1
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Billie Rinaldi <[email protected]>wrote: > I'm doing it for 1.6.0. Rather, I've done it once already, and am willing > to do it again after the other patches / bug fixes are in. > > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Sounds reasonable. I presume this wouldn't apply to 1.6.0 since it's in > > progress? John could still opt to do it. > > > > We should include example text of necessary follow-on actions based on > > results of analyze. > > > > Call a vote? > > > > -- > > Sean > > On Nov 8, 2013 9:38 AM, "Billie Rinaldi" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > I would like to add running mvn dependency:analyze as a step in our > > release > > > process. This should be done with both major and minor releases, as it > > is > > > very easy to add new direct dependencies without realizing it (when > they > > > were previously transitive dependencies), or to leave around > dependencies > > > that are no longer needed. > > > > > > Billie > > > > > > -- | - - - | Bill Havanki | Solutions Architect, Cloudera Government Solutions | - - -
