Ah never mind. Got further. Basically, I had specified
the yarn.resourcemanager.address to use the rescourcemanager scheduler port
by mistake. Using the proper port got me further. Thanks!


On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Roshan Punnoose <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yeah, it seems to be honoring the kinit cache properly and retrieving the
> correct kerberos ticket for validation.
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Billie Rinaldi 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> I haven't tried that out yet.  Were you following the instructions at
>>
>> https://github.com/hortonworks/hoya/blob/master/src/site/markdown/security.md
>> ?
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Roshan Punnoose <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I am trying to run Hoya on a Kerberos Secure cluster. I believe I have
>> all
>> > the keytabs in place, and have been able to run mapreduce jobs with my
>> > user, etc. However, when I run the "hoya create" command I get this
>> > exception:
>> >
>> > org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Client cannot
>> > authenticate via:[TOKEN]
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> org.apache.hadoop.security.SaslRpcClient.selectSaslClient(SaslRpcClient.java:170)
>> >
>> > I thought that Hoya should be using Kerberos instead of the TOKEN.
>> >
>> > Also noticed that the SASL NEGOTIATE is responding with "TOKEN" as well:
>> >
>> > 2013-12-03 20:45:04,530 [main] DEBUG security.SaslRpcClient - Received
>> SASL
>> > message state: NEGOTIATE
>> > auths {
>> >   method: "TOKEN"
>> >   mechanism: "DIGEST-MD5"
>> >   protocol: ""
>> >   serverId: "default"
>> > }
>> >
>> > That doesn't seem right either. Is there something I might be missing?
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Roshan Punnoose <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Yeah I noticed the git-flow style branching. Pretty cool.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Roshan:
>> > >> FYI
>> > >> The develop branch of Hoya repo should be more up-to-date.
>> > >>
>> > >> Cheers
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Billie Rinaldi <
>> > [email protected]
>> > >> >wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > Adding --debug to the command may print out more things as well.
>> >  Also,
>> > >> the
>> > >> > start-up is not instantaneous.  In the Yarn logs, you should see at
>> > >> first
>> > >> > one container under the application (e.g.
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> logs/userlogs/application_1381800165150_0014/container_1381800165150_0014_01_000001)
>> > >> > and its out.txt will contain information about the initialization
>> > >> process.
>> > >> > If that goes well, it will start up containers for the other
>> > processes.
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Roshan Punnoose <
>> [email protected]>
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > > Ah ok, will check the logs. When the create command did not seem
>> to
>> > do
>> > >> > > anything, I assumed it was just initializing the cluster.json
>> > >> descriptor
>> > >> > in
>> > >> > > hdfs.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Billie Rinaldi
>> > >> > > <[email protected]>wrote:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > > Sounds like we should plan a meetup.  The examples page [1]
>> has an
>> > >> > > example
>> > >> > > > create command to use for Accumulo (it requires a few more
>> options
>> > >> than
>> > >> > > the
>> > >> > > > HBase create command).  After that your instance should be up
>> and
>> > >> > > running.
>> > >> > > > If not, look in the Yarn application logs to see what's going
>> > >> wrong.  I
>> > >> > > > haven't tried freezing and thawing an instance yet, just
>> freezing
>> > >> and
>> > >> > > > destroying to clean up.  I've noticed freezing leaves some of
>> the
>> > >> > > processes
>> > >> > > > running, but this is probably because I'm supposed to be
>> testing
>> > on
>> > >> > Linux
>> > >> > > > instead of OS X.
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > [1]:
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://github.com/hortonworks/hoya/blob/develop/src/site/markdown/examples.md
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Roshan Punnoose <
>> > [email protected]
>> > >> >
>> > >> > > > wrote:
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > > I would be very interested in looking into Hoya as well. I
>> > pulled
>> > >> > down
>> > >> > > > the
>> > >> > > > > code and got as far as being able to create the accumulo
>> cluster
>> > >> > > > descriptor
>> > >> > > > > through the "hoya create" command. When I tried the "hoya
>> thaw"
>> > >> > nothing
>> > >> > > > > seemed to happen. Still debugging, but it would be very
>> useful
>> > to
>> > >> > see a
>> > >> > > > > quick tutorial on the usage over google+ if possible. Thanks!
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Steve Loughran <
>> > >> > > [email protected]
>> > >> > > > > >wrote:
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > Hi, I'm working on it, with bille helping on accumulo
>> > specifics
>> > >> &
>> > >> > > > testing
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > >    1. The code is up on github;
>> > >> > https://github.com/hortonworks/hoya.
>> > >> > > > > what
>> > >> > > > > >    we don't have is any good issue tracking -I'm using our
>> > >> internal
>> > >> > > > JIRA
>> > >> > > > > >    server for that which is bad as it keeps the project
>> less
>> > >> open
>> > >> > > -and
>> > >> > > > > > loses
>> > >> > > > > >    decision history
>> > >> > > > > >    2.  we're on a two week sprint cycle, next one ends on
>> > monday
>> > >> > with
>> > >> > > > > >    another release coming out -focus on secure cluster
>> support
>> > >> and
>> > >> > > > better
>> > >> > > > > >    liveness monitoring
>> > >> > > > > >    3. Bille has been deploying accumulo with it.
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > We're doing development with the focus on hbase, though it
>> is
>> > >> > > designed
>> > >> > > > to
>> > >> > > > > > have different back ends "providers" -the accumulo one is
>> the
>> > >> > > > > alternative,
>> > >> > > > > > and most of what we do benefits both of them, it's just we
>> are
>> > >> > > testing
>> > >> > > > > more
>> > >> > > > > > with HBase and adding some features (liveness probes) there
>> > >> first.
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > If we could get broader participation that would help with
>> the
>> > >> > > accumulo
>> > >> > > > > > testing and mean that we could put it into the Apache
>> > Incubation
>> > >> > > > process
>> > >> > > > > > -they insist on that broadness by the time you get out of
>> > >> > incubation.
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > -contact me if you want to know more
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > -i'd be happy to do a remote presentation of hoya over
>> google+
>> > >> or
>> > >> > > > webex.
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > I'm actually trying to set up a remote-only-YARN-HUG group
>> > >> between
>> > >> > > the
>> > >> > > > > US,
>> > >> > > > > > EU and Asia, where we'd have remote-only sessions in
>> different
>> > >> > > > timezones;
>> > >> > > > > > Hoya would be one of the topics.
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > On 17 October 2013 20:07, Ed Kohlwey <[email protected]>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > I was wondering if anyone knows what the current status
>> of
>> > >> > Accumulo
>> > >> > > > in
>> > >> > > > > > Hoya
>> > >> > > > > > > is. We're really interested in running Accumulo in Yarn
>> in a
>> > >> > > > production
>> > >> > > > > > > environment and helping to mature the project to the
>> point
>> > >> that
>> > >> > we
>> > >> > > > > could
>> > >> > > > > > do
>> > >> > > > > > > so.
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > Are the current issues mostly around testing or are there
>> > some
>> > >> > > known
>> > >> > > > > > issues
>> > >> > > > > > > already? Would it help to be able to run over a large
>> > cluster
>> > >> or
>> > >> > is
>> > >> > > > > there
>> > >> > > > > > > some additional development that needs to be done?
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > --
>> > >> > > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> > >> > > > > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the
>> individual
>> > >> or
>> > >> > > > entity
>> > >> > > > > to
>> > >> > > > > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is
>> > >> > > confidential,
>> > >> > > > > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable
>> law. If
>> > >> the
>> > >> > > > reader
>> > >> > > > > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are
>> hereby
>> > >> > > notified
>> > >> > > > > that
>> > >> > > > > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution,
>> disclosure
>> > >> or
>> > >> > > > > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
>> > you
>> > >> > have
>> > >> > > > > > received this communication in error, please contact the
>> > sender
>> > >> > > > > immediately
>> > >> > > > > > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to