> On Nov. 18, 2013, 6:33 p.m., Josh Elser wrote:
> > test/system/continuous/hdfs-agitator.pl, line 120
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/15650/diff/1/?file=388001#file388001line120>
> >
> >     Maybe rename this from hdfs-agitator to ha-hdfs-agitator (or similar). 
> > agitator.pl also agitates datanodes so the name is a bit of a misnomer.
> 
> Sean Busbey wrote:
>     I'd rather pull the agitator.pl parts that mess with datanodes here. that 
> way we'd get better failure testing for when data nodes and tablet servers 
> are not the same set of machines and we could flex more advanced HDFS failure 
> conditions (like handling rack loss).
>     
>     Sound good?
> 
> Josh Elser wrote:
>     Yup. Makes sense.

Filed as ACCUMULO-1971


- Sean


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15650/#review29059
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 5, 2013, 9:49 p.m., Sean Busbey wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/15650/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 5, 2013, 9:49 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for accumulo and Alex Moundalexis.
> 
> 
> Bugs: ACCUMULO-1794
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1794
> 
> 
> Repository: accumulo
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> ACCUMULO-1794 adds hdfs failover to continuous integration test.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   test/system/continuous/continuous-env.sh.example 830ae86 
>   test/system/continuous/hdfs-agitator.pl PRE-CREATION 
>   test/system/continuous/start-agitator.sh 52e5a4e 
>   test/system/continuous/stop-agitator.sh b853a55 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15650/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Ran the hdfs agitator on a CDH4 cluster configured for HA. it successfully 
> caused the active namenode to failover as it went.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sean Busbey
> 
>

Reply via email to