Yes, at least ACCUMULO-1940 (which I upgraded to critical). -Eric
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Keith Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Eric Newton <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Here are some that I find to be motivating. However, I would still like > to > > wait until most of the 1.6.0 long running tests have been run. But if > > someone else is doing the work, I'm not going to say no. > > > > ACCUMULO-1686 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1686 > >loggers > > die when the zookeeper they are using > > disconnectsACCUMULO-1800< > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1800>delete > > mutations not working through the > > ProxyACCUMULO-2037<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2037 > > >Tablets > > not assigned to last > > locationACCUMULO-1940< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1940 > > >Data > > file in !METADATA differs from in memory > > dataACCUMULO-2112<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2112 > > >master > > does not balance after intermittent communication failure > > > > Some of these issues have a priority of major. Do you think they should be > bumped up? > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Keith Turner <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > What are the issues motivating a 1.4.5 release? > > > > > > > > > > > I went over some back in the call for 1.4.5 and 1.5.1 last week[1]. > > > > > > Primarily it's that 1.6.0 is an uncertain amount of time out and both > of > > > those branches has a very large number of issues closed against them. > > > > > > [1]: http://bit.ly/1ekSqaw > > > > > >
